The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel, two Israeli officials told Axios.

Why it matters: It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held, Israeli officials said. President Biden is facing sharp criticism among Americans who oppose his support of Israel. The administration in February asked Israel to provide assurances that U.S.-made weapons were being used by Israel Defense Forces in Gaza in accordance with international law. Israel provided a signed letter of assurances in March.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We’ve been shipping Israel ammo to kill Palestinians for over half a year. We only now stopped one shipment. Think about that.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It was initially for defense after a massacre when the Iron Dome was breached in October. That was completely justified support. The munitions sold since Netanyahu began indiscriminately killing Palestinians are not.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Agreed. It’s been the standard since Israel was conceived in 1948, but there are a lot more liberal people in Israel now. The ultra-orthodox make up only 13% now, and those are the conservatives that got Netanyahu into power. He only has a 15% approval rating since January, and there have been massive protests since March. Let’s hope they do the right thing with the next election and allow Palestinians access to their holy land.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The previous attacks during the Biden administration were attempted attacks on Hamas, not attacks directed at Palestinians. If Israel always wanted to kill all Palestinians, that would’ve been done in 1985 when this conflict started. Netanyahu has been using the attack on Oct. 7 to justify the shift in tactics from targeting Hamas to “we can’t tell them apart.”

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. No, all the children shot during the March of Return were not Hamas, nor were the thousands killed before 2006.

            2. Palestinians have a right to resist. Israel, being an illegitimate settler apartheid state, has no such right. Attacks on Hamas are not justified.

                • rusticus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You say in a thread where the current president has delayed weapons delivery for the first time in 50 years. STFU

      • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is the equivalent of someone taking your house and throwing you in the basement and then when you come out and attack decades later they fight back and say its for self defense. Please.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So Native Americans should just start murdering Americans until they leave? One state is the only equitable solution at this point.

          • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. I’m not against a one state solution
            2. Stolen land/property should be given back
            3. Your example is disanalgous, run the clock back to when the colonies were being formed. If a colonist from Europe came and took their house or the land they use or live on they have every right to fight back.
            4. If a colonist attacks me and kills my family I have a right to fight back. If I fight back then its not self defense for them but for me.
            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You’re right. It’s an imperfect analogy. The Jews that occupy Israel once lived in Israel. Colonialists never originated in America. If you want to run the clock back, take a real look at who is responsible for the creation of Israel.

              The Jews didn’t have the means to fight anyone, having just been displaced from their homes in Germany and Poland. Truman and the UN, against Great Britain’s protest, provided the necessary forces as an investment against the colonial presence of Great Britain and socialist presence of the USSR in the form of Arab/Palestinian support. The US is more to blame for the creation and existence of the state of Israel than the Israelis.

              https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=history_etds

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The Zionist terrorist organizations that ethnically cleansed portions of Mandatory Palestine through murder sprees of civilians are responsible

                Stop posting the thesis of a dude going for his masters degree in history at ‘Old Dominion’ university written in 1980 as a source when this was recent enough that we literally have primary sources for what happened.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            No one in Israel wants that.

            Also, this comparison is very apt. Israelis explicitly want to get to the point where they have the land and can just give land acknowledgments. This view though is dependent on "Never Again’’ meaning nothing.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Great, now stop all money and weapons to Israel entirely. Every day Biden doesn’t do this we get closer to a criminal orange man as president.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But what about the profits? You can’t go around not profiting just because a few thousand children are being killed, disfigured and orphaned! It’s like you don’t understand neoliberalism at all.

      Sarcasm aside, stopping the money and weapons isn’t enough to stop the genocide because Israel never needed any of it in the first place. But if you funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to defence contractors, there’s nothing the US government won’t consent to.

      Orange man won’t be any different. He’s not even trying to pretend it’s not a genocide, just coming out and saying Israel should “finish the problem”.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        stopping the money and weapons isn’t enough to stop the genocide

        “This thing isn’t good because it doesn’t do the thing all the way, so the thing isn’t worthwhile”.

        Have a nice day political agitator, now get blocked.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      While I’d love to see that, it would be unprecedented in the history of US-Israel relations. If it does happen at all, it will definitely come slowly.

      Also, you may want to stop putting election abstinence out there as a consequence. We’re all aware that Trump will make things worse for Palestinians as well as everyone who isn’t a rich white American industrialist male.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        it would be unprecedented in the history of US-Israel relations

        Not unprecedented. Ronald Reagan used the threat of halting arms exports to Israel in '83, in order to end PM Menachem Begin’s terror bombing of Beirut.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yes. He then sold arms to Iran, known as the Iran-Contra scandal, which in turn went to Hezbollah, inciting the Israel-Iran proxy war we’re protesting today. Then he provided military aid to Israel under agreement that they use it to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon. He literally is the father of this proxy conflict. Do not glorify his actions.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do not glorify his actions.

            I don’t think I’m glorifying anything. Merely pointing out a moment in history in which a President threatened arms sales to Israel, prior to this one.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            How is this the response to a post directly pointing out what you said is wrong.

            “Yes I was wrong, but he was horrible so it doesn’t count.”

            Ronald Reagan was a piece of shit. He also did the thing you said no one had done before.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, again, he didn’t. He only withheld aid in order to direct the use of the subsequent military aid. That’s not being “tough on Israel.” It’s telling them where to shoot.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                No, he didn’t. The saturation bombing of Beirut was a step too far, especially as it was fucking with the US’s attempts to broker peace in Lebanon. It also actually pissed Reagan off who described it in the phone call as ‘a holocaust’

                You have the weirdest, most demented, view of American history as it relates to Israel I think I’ve ever seen.