• ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    3:2 is great for productivity on a smaller screen for sure.

    But I gotta hard disagree on ultrawide. It sure looks pretty but unless you play simulation games exclusively I find that they make the experience worse. Their main benefit is that they’re more cost effective (both the screen itself and that it’s easier to drive) than a triple monitor setup while satisfying to a decent degree all use cases were a triple monitor setup excels.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gotta disagree with you as an ultrawide user.

      Watching movies is way more fun than on a TV.
      Working on it is very cool. Research is very good with it like browser on the left and Visual Studio on the right.

    • Zari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Say whaaaaat…

      The 21:9 monitors are superior to a lot of games.

      Unfortunately for you “you have no idea how to play games”. Games have evolved a lot as well as gameplay. Also, you have to keep in mind the fact that you didn’t evolve at all.

      For your knowledge 49" monitor is net superior in RTS games, it is at the point of cheating. But I guess you are doodoo player in terms of vision.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      49 isn’t the ultra wide that’s super ultrawide. The 21:9s are so superior to 16:9s