• PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 天前

    I really would be happy to. I need them to answer my question first, though, in order to make the point that I want to make. Instead they evaporated, which means I don’t owe them continuation of the conversation with the blank void they’ve left in their absence.

    • Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 天前

      If you’re happy to answer, then simply answer. You don’t need the conversation to proceed entirely on your terms - you want it to. You could easily respond to their questions first and then pose your own to make your point. Your point may even carry more weight if they refuse to answer after you’ve just done so.

      Their choice not to address your question immediately after you declined to answer theirs isn’t unreasonable. Answering their question wouldn’t have prevented you from making your point; if it did, then perhaps it wasn’t a particularly strong point to begin with.

      • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 天前

        You don’t need the conversation to proceed entirely on your terms - you want it to.

        I’m not the one who dipped from it as soon as I got something that wasn’t entirely on my terms.

        I’m done talking about this lol

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      You know your point is bad because you keep having to play these tedious “teehee you must answer my questions three!” Bullshit games rather than just stating it.