Cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/9516433

By the end of 2023, Russians who support a troop withdrawal from Ukraine “without achieving the war goals” were for the first time more numerous than those who oppose such a move. Ordinary Russians consider the war to be the most important negative fact in their lives and want it to end quickly.

This is the conclusion reached by independent sociologists working for Khroniky (“Chronicles”) and the Public Sociology Laboratory projects. It is backed up by those who measure public opinion for the Kremlin.

Other analysts – from Z-bloggers [pro-war bloggers] to clinical psychologists – have also noticed a lack of mass support for the war effort. They all observe that Russians are not ready to protest to end the war, but nonetheless expect Vladimir Putin to end it. As the March presidential election approaches, the Kremlin’s political strategists seem to be trying to meet this demand.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the race.
    Who will tire of the war first. Russia, Ukraine, the Ukranian partners. And how many will die before that point.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately Ukraine’s partners seem to be the first ones to get tired, which is what Russia is counting on. And if Trump wins the US election, Ukraine’s weapon aid from the US will likely cease completely, and European far right parties will use that to screw Ukrainian support in the EU too

      • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        American weapon aid has already ceased. It’s truly dire on the front. What could get worse is if American intelligence aid also stopped. As hard as it is for Europe to replace America’s supply of 155mm, replacing US intelligence is going to be even harder. That is to say, it would be absolutely impossible.

        • Rubanski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          British intelligence is quite advanced tho, but completely replacing? Very difficult

        • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Now, the support for Ukraine in the US, senate, and house are overwhelming, but speaker Johansson can just delay any votings forever it seems.

  • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    without achieving the war’s objectives

    What exactly does the Russian populous think those are anyway?

    • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Russian populace doesn’t think about it.
      They think about their private life and let the “experts” deal with “politics”.

      • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        That was what I’ve garhered. So again … What the hell does this headline even mean when it says “without achieving the war goals”

      • tillimarleen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you think we deal differently with it in the West and do you think it is morally more appropriate?

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    As the March presidential election approaches, the Kremlin’s political strategists seem to be trying to meet this demand.

    I thought it was impossible for Putin to lose anyway.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was impossible for the Soviet Union to lose in Afghanistan. It was impossible for the USA to lose in Vietnam.

      Yet both did. Russia could lose in the exact same sense as the above. Hell Russia could lose in the same way the USA lost in Afghanistan recently.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        As the March presidential election approaches, the Kremlin’s political strategists seem to be trying to meet this demand.

        I thought it was impossible for Putin to lose anyway.

        I"m talking about the election process. Do we believe Russian elections are no longer performative events with a predetermined outcome?

        • owen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Meh, a blatently fraudelent election could be the catalyst for serious civil unrest and violence

        • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think Putin has needed to do a lot of election fraud. He rules over the media, and has outlawed any serious opposition. I think of it more as an opinion poll than an election. For Putin I think unpopularity is a threat to regime stability, so he probably takes it seriously.

  • OKaybin@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    One can only hope that the large majority of population one day as enough of the war and forces Putin to pull out. I wonder how many young Russians actually consider NATO a threat like the boomers in that country.