The move marks a unique and possibly groundbreaking chapter in the deepening dilemma of what to do with imperiled coastal homes, which are becoming only more vulnerable amid rising seas, more intense storms and unceasing erosion.

Often, states and localities have little money for buyouts of such places and little political will to pursue the controversial topic of retreating from threatened shorelines. Homeowners face unenviable options of letting their homes become inundated or spending large sums to try to move them, both of which have happened in Rodanthe.

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a good idea, but I have a suggestion:

    Wait until these people are even more desperate. They bought these houses as vacation homes and rental properties, and knew the area was at risk. They’re lucky to be getting anything at all.

    They don’t need the money. Play hardball, and save it for the thousands of people who will.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’d have to actually stop building high-rises 50m from the shoreline before this will happen. It absolutely amazes me that people are still building anything in Miami.

      • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah we are going to have to dismantle some parts of Miami soon to be able to keep a functioning port in FL.