Ogmios

Okay, but where do the people from other places come from?

You’re not thinking this all the way through.

And where do you think those immigrants come from?

Shout out to my biggest fan!

Because a society can only survive through procreation. This incessant push on social media to demonize children is seen by many as, at least in part, a hostile effort by bad actors like Russia and China to undermine and destroy the future of western civilization.

It’s not even speaking about reasons. Just results.

I fully support your decisions to remove yourselves from the gene pool!

It’s going to get the most toxic elements from twitter. Social media just isn’t cool anymore, like it was back when big sites first developed. They were already overwhelmed with users reporting each other almost as soon as people started moving there.

Brainrot Girlfriend was probably responsible for the word’s popularity.

Darling in the Franxx?

We’ve noticed.

Well, personally I do tend to listen to a broad selection of similar outlets, but whenever something catches my interest specifically I do some light digging to verify the primary sources they’re reporting on. Occasionally I’m not able to sort things out, but it’s actually quite shocking how many sensational stories will fall apart almost immediately when you look even a little bit deeper. Far too often, even just reading the article itself will actually debunk it’s own headline.

We had something open and trustworthy before big tech, but idiots decided to attempt to create a ‘global village’ by inviting in all the world’s backward cultures.

It’s also notable that human error tends to occur in predictable ways which can be prepared for and noticed much more easily, while machine errors tend to be entirely random and unpredictable. For example: When a human makes a judgment on a medical issue which poses a very significant risk to the patient, they will generally put more effort into ensuring an accurate result/pay more attention to what they’re doing.

That’s largely because you listen to media outlets run by them.

Even a 99% success rate wouldn’t be great with a high enough volume. If you curate 1,000,000 pieces of information with a 99% success rate, you’re still going to make 10,000 mistakes.

Remember: Corporate merchandise is what makes you happy!

Removed by mod

The reason is that the ‘journalist’ uses intense emotional language to highlight only one side of the story, while completely glossing over the fact that their ‘victim’ literally knocked someone out with a weapon. Any rational person ought to at least raise an eyebrow while they consider what could have provoked bystanders to jump in, when presented with that fact.

It’s really obvious rage bait.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod