Pakistan has made guarantees that they will retaliate with their nuclear weapons if a nuclear strike occurs on Iran.

EDIT: I went to find a source and Pakistan has walked this back and are denying that they ever said it

I never would have interpreted the headline to mean “the same exact plane”?

If I cared what ChatGPT says, I would ask it.

the Top section of each wikipedia article is already a summary of the article

It’s the only way that makes sense

Yes, and the post title is just the title of the article 🤦

You never clicked on the link, did you?

loses the argument “we’re at the age-old internet stalemate!” LMAO

Yes, but not just plants

American exceptionalism definitely sucks, but this is not an example of American exceptionalism. The source is an article from an American magazine, published for an American audience.

Yeah I mean the tax payers have literally already paid for all of both SpaceX and Starlink. The public paid for it, the public should own it.

Programmers seem to be using the screen as the flat reference.

In screen coordinates, the origin is the top left corner of the screen, and the Y-axis increases towards the bottom of the screen. So Y still isn’t “up”

You looked down at the math book on your desk that showed the X-Y graph on the page, and the Y axis extended forward, away from you. Z was “up”.

Z-up right handed makes the most sense

That’s a load bearing “yet”

Have they even achieved orbit?

There is a distinction between data and an action you perform on data (matrix maths, codec algorithm, etc.). It’s literally completely different.

Incorrect. You might want to take an information theory class before speaking on subjects like this.

I literally cannot be wrong that LLMs cannot think or reason, there’s no room for debate, it’s settled long ago.

Lmao yup totally, it’s not like this type of research currently gets huge funding at universities and institutions or anything like that 😂 it’s a dead research field because it’s already “settled”. (You’re wrong 🤭)

LLMs are just tools not sentient or verging on sentient

Correct. No one claimed they are “sentient” (you actually mean “sapient”, not “sentient”, but it’s fine because people commonly mix these terms up. Sentience is about the physical senses. If you can respond to stimuli from your environment, you’re sentient, if you can “I think, therefore I am”, you’re sapient). And no, LLMs are not sapient either, and sapience has nothing to do with neural networks’ ability to mathematically reason or use logic, you’re just moving the goalpost. But at least you moved it far enough to be actually correct?

This behavior is associated with autism

Yeah we can tell

Even I’m not impressed by Elon Musk’s PR team pushing a narrative of him being a victim of dug addiction in order to shift responsibility for his actions and also give him an opportunity to repair his public image by getting clean.

^ the real headline. There isn’t an amount of ketamine you can take to make you do a sieg heil on stage