Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s possible, but it’s not like technology halted in that time and there has been a big energy independence drive regardless of Reagan.

      The harsh truth is that we still need fossil fuels today.

      We’re probably going to need them for decades to come, even if we have massive green energy drives.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        big energy independence drive

        This is a great weasel word. “Energy independence.” Like we’re going to hook cables up to George Washington and run on carbon-neutral Freedom Juice.™

        “Energy independence” still means using fossil fuels. Just maybe different ones like natural gas instead of coal. There’s less emissions, sure, but it’s not anything like what Carter envisioned: Solar power stations in LEO, beaming gigawatts of carbon neutral power down from space.