• LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t understand people who get coffee shop coffee every day. That’s so expensive. Just make it at home.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A simple cup of filter coffee is easy enough to make at home with cheap equipment, sure, but espresso/milk drinks are a different story, and some people prefer milk drinks to filter coffee. A decent home espresso machine that can also steam milk is gonna run you around $150 at the low end. Some people don’t have that much laying around at once, but can afford the $3 cappuccino a couple times a week.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          couple

          4 times

          couple

          I think we might have different definitions of that word. So it really should be 26 weeks, which we can clarify is 6 months.

          So 6 months of saving for a treat a couple times a week? That doesn’t sound worth it to most people

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly, thank you. It takes so long just to break even with even the cheapest home espresso equipment, plus you then have to learn to use and maintain said equipment - for some people, the convenience of having a barista fix you a better cup of coffee than you could make yourself at home is worth the $3.

        • Pyotr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          An aeropress is 40$, so it’s even cheaper. 4 weeks or so then based on that math!

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it costs $150 it isn’t an espresso machine. I hope you missed a zero because the other point is pretty bad too in that context.

        • bilbofraggins@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on whether you consider a Flair a “machine” I guess… But yeah, I would agree you’re probably better off with a moka pot than most $150 or less espresso machines. For $150 budget to make strong coffee with milk type drinks, I’d recommend most folks get a moka pot and milk frother.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a 70€ espresso machine. It makes decent espresso, cheaper than paying 1€ at the bar.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A venti drink is like 20oz, is probably at least 3 shots of espresso, and is not comparable to the drinks I’m talking about.

          You can get a short cappuccino (8oz) from Starbucks for around $3. This is comparable to most cafe prices for a reasonably sized, single-shot milk drink.

          • travysh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The crazy thing is that, at least at Starbucks, a Venti hot drink is 2 shots, just like the grande. Paying extra for just more milk and sugar!

      • LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use a moka pot at home with milk and sugar. It’s like half way to espresso for much cheaper. When I’m feeling fancy I have a cheap milk frother too. It isn’t as good as a real espresso drink, but I get those occasionally as a treat.