In a scathing filing, the special counsel pushed back on Judge Aileen Cannon’s interpretations of laws that could define the case against Trump

Special Counsel Jack Smith went toe-to-toe with U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon over her requests for jury instructions in Donald Trump’s classified documents case.

In a scathing filing submitted Tuesday, Smith accused Cannon of operating on an “unstated and fundamentally flawed legal premise” when she requested that the parties in the case draft different versions of their proposed jury instructions based on their competing interpretations of laws governing classified materials and presidential records.

Trump has argued that his retention of classified documents after his ouster from the White House was perfectly legal. Claiming that he both unilaterally telepathically declassified the documents, and that they were simply personal records he was already authorized to take. The former president’s trial on 40 charges related to his alleged mishandling of the documents is scheduled to begin in May, but will likely be delayed.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nah, this is good to hear about - I don’t really care about his feelings either but Cannon is a corrupt and incompetent judge.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Cannon is a corrupt and incompetent judge.

      Corrupt, yes, but I’m not so sure about incompetent. If she were incompetent then there would be tricks to help Trump that she missed, but as far as I know she’s executed every opportunity for corruption perfectly.

      Do you have evidence that she’s anything less than a goddamned veritable virtuoso of corrupt traitorousness?