• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now the only reason this is a terrible idea is that it requires first rendezvousing with a spacecraft every time you want to deorbit it. You’ll have the propellent to do this what, 2 or 3 times for every garbage collection spacecraft launched? That’s one enormous cost…

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s probably not the case. We have efficient thrusters now. And the spacecraft will stay on the same orbit all its life.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, we have hall effect thrusters, but it doesn’t really matter, the spacecraft still needs to push the mass of both spacecrafts a pretty significant distance and then return to the orbit of was at.

        That’s just a lot of work.

        I’ll admit, that using this for cleaning up geostationary orbit is more viable that leo, but it’s still questionable how long this will actually be useful.