• Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A budget that goes into space exploration, development of groundbreaking science that has its use both in space and on Earth, popularization of science among masses, democratizing access to cutting-edge knowledge, making it free for everyone, including kids and the poor, to access at any time? Yes, please.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably true to some extent. Though, at what point do you decide it’s better to just directly give the money to people?

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s no situation where it isn’t better to just give the money directly to the people who need it.

            • flerp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Considering it is such a small percentage of the budget and they have developed so much useful technology (https://www.howtogeek.com/831363/these-nasa-innovations-are-all-around-us-everyday/)

              I would say, take the money from other things that suck, like handouts to the rich and wasteful military overspending which would easily cover the things we need to cover. Defunding NASA would contribute to the dummification of the country and is a terrible idea.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Considering it is such a small percentage

                Currently, but during many of the innovations it was a much higher percentage. And why do you assume there wouldn’t be other, maybe more impactful innovations, if NASA money and NASA researchers weren’t working on something else?

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That would be great, but that’s not NASA’s department. Try Congress first. Then the DOD. Edit: and then the morally bankrupt billionaires.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not advocating NASA donate the money, I’m advocating considering cutting NASA’s budget

      • a Kendrick fan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially if you don’t live in the shitty country. Yes please, sacrifice the physical and mental wellbeing of Americans for an indepth knowledge of the Universe just before you regress into full facism. Your war crimes won’t be overlooked though.

        • DarkenLM@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

          I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…

          • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seriously, I’m always confused by people complaining about NASA’s budget. It’s peanuts in comparison to the other stuff our Government wastes money on. Also doesn’t help that the government itself is responsible for a lot of the money wasting that happens at NASA. The Artemis program being the perfect example, which is basically just a glorified jobs program at this point, as mandated by the government, instead of actually being a smart way of building a rocket.

            • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              US americans are complaining for nasa, public schools if they don’t have kids, public health sector, even for bike lanes because they use no bikes, but almost never for all the military expenses on the other side of the earth.

              • flerp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                People who are so uneducated that they think funding public education is a bad investment are great proof of why we need better public education…

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          NASA isn’t sacrificing American’s wellbeing, regressing into fascism, or committing war crimes. That’s multiple other branches of the government. Despite whatever media you’re consuming the US gov isn’t one unified dictatorship, as much as a certain political group would like it to be.

          NASA is one of the few branches of our government that’s actually somewhat decent and doesn’t need a complete overhaul to benefit our country or world. It’s already paying us back the relatively small budget allocated to them in several ways. So your comment is basically a whataboutism.

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      …or about 3% of the military budget. Quite a bargain.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe you’s could do a similar thing for healthcare and get healthcare for free, like this new nasa+ thing. Wouldn’t that be wild

      • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what about the profits of insurance companies that act as gatekeepers to your healthcare?? Are those people just supposed to get different jobs? Bet you didn’t think about who you would be hurting

        Sarcasm

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The funny thing with tax is you don’t get choose how it’s spent. Tax money is public money that ought to be spent in the public interest, and NASA is a perfectly good example of this. Other good examples are infrastructure, parks, public healthcare and free education. Bad examples of tax expenditure are the ridiculous military complex, massive corporate subsidies and contractors doing poor work that the government should be directly controlling.