totally_notAcat (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agoGot 7 or 8 / 14 rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageGot 7 or 8 / 14 rulelemmy.blahaj.zonetotally_notAcat (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarekey@lemmy.keychat.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoHe forgot to include “- Can recognize satire”
minus-squarejlow (he/him)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoYeah, this has to be satire, right? Right?
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoYou’d hope so but it aligns way too close to a lot of the “trad wife” types for me to be too sure
minus-squareskulblaka@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThat just means it’s good satire
minus-squareHappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoNah, good satire can be recognized as satire. This is indistinguishable from what some manosphere dudes post.
He forgot to include “- Can recognize satire”
Yeah, this has to be satire, right? Right?
You’d hope so but it aligns way too close to a lot of the “trad wife” types for me to be too sure
That just means it’s good satire
Nah, good satire can be recognized as satire. This is indistinguishable from what some manosphere dudes post.