Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft has proposed asking voters whether they are in favor of allowing “dangerous and unregulated abortions until live birth.”

What a dumbass.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    On the bright side, Republicans already tried fucking with the language in Ohio, and we all saw how well that went.

    Give it up, you troglodytes. Nobody wants your anti-choice bullshit.

    • AnotherAttorney@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nobody wants your anti-choice bullshit.

      A majority of Americans favor regulations limiting access to abortion.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            You made that number up. I read the entire article, and not only does it not say that anywhere (and in fact, 64% isn’t a figure used for any metric), it says 49% support some form of restriction versus 47% who want expansive abortion rights.

            The problem is “some form of restriction” is a terrible metric to categorize people. Does that mean FDA regulating mifepristone? Because 63% support having at least prescription access to it. Does it mean having better laws? Because 61% think the overturning of Dobbs was a bad decision. Does it mean preventing first trimester abortions? Because 69% support abortion access in the first trimester.

            I don’t know where you got “64% support some form of restriction” from, but it certainly wasn’t your source.

            • AnotherAttorney@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              My friend, are you illiterate? From the article:

              51% say it should be legal “only under certain circumstances,” and 13% say it should be illegal in all circumstances.

              Now add them and tell me what you get…

              The 47% and 49% figures that you’re reading are made from a subdivision of that 51% “certain circumstances” category. Like, it says that right above those figures. To that end, that 47% doesn’t mean no abortion restrictions – it means “legal in all or most cases.”

  • Djtecha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This argument makes zero sense. Wouldn’t a legal abortion tend to have more regulation then an illegal abortion, or for those in the know a back ally abortion? And the gall to back it up with intention to be the clearest explanation on the ballot, what a douche nozzle.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    So this would allow safe, regulated abortions and also allow dangerous, unregulated abortions after live birth. That’s a little extreme for me. I can’t support post-birth abortions.