Surprisingly based from ND, to be completely honest

  • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Except it would be reducing the influence of career politicians by increasing the influence of corporate plants. It would make political offices even more of a revolving door than they already are. Would also increase the number of people just going rogue on their last term because “what are you gonna do, not elect me again?”

    A whole lot of other shit would need to change first before implementing term limits would make any sense to do. At the very least overturning the Citizens United decision and some sort of mechanism to help ensure that politicians actually govern according to the platform they run on. And arguably both of those things would do a lot more to help our current problems than term limits would…which means neither is ever going to happen.

    • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think these are separate issues and can be managed using different strategies. Corporate influence is about $$ and many different, constitutional remedies can be applied for that.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Why would corporate influence increase with term limits? It’s way easier to influence the same person for 30 years than a new person every 5-10 years.

      • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not when the new person goes straight from being on your payroll to being in office, then back to being on your payroll when they’re done.