• DMBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago
    1. oral contract
    2. If it was important, she should have prepared a back-up.
    • escew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s already been dismissed by the tribunal. Hilarious that it got enough attention to be in the news.

      • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’d cut her a bit of slack.

        She might have been dreaming of this for a long time, she thought that she could trust her boyfriend to do this simple and easy task, but one very important to her, and he fails to do it, and since they’re in a relationship, one doesn’t think of writing stuff down.

        If it happened as reported, I agree with the ruling, but I wouldn’t be so quick to ridicule her.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In the situation you’re presenting, I would be empathetic to her loss of the money and experience. However, all of that empathy disappears when she tries to sue because of it. The ridicule is for suing.