I expected ridiculous propaganda from Adobe, but they give absolutely no reasons why Photoshop is better than Gimp and list a bunch of things that Gimp can do too.

They only mention Gimp a few times at the top and they never mention it again after:

How is Photoshop different from Gimp?

They ask a question they literally never answer.

They could have lied, they could have stretched the truth, they could have brought up the paltry number of things Photoshop does that Gimp can’t. They never do. They never say what Gimp can or can’t do.

Like I said, I expected ridiculous propaganda. I didn’t expect them to just pretend Gimp doesn’t exist in their article about Gimp.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 months ago

    I truly hate how shit like Adobe and ProTools become the only acceptable software to use “inside the industry”. Plenty of independent self publishers use tools like Gimp and Reaper. But the velvet rope mindset refuses to accept that in certain circles.

    Those same types of folks are the most likely to get replaced by AI. So maybe that will be some bittersweet Schadenfreude.

    • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think, for the most part, is that GIMP is obscure. Not as in ‘unknown’ but as in ‘really hard to master, how does anything work?’ It has been this way, voluntarily.

      I think it’s what lacks in GIMP, a good user experience.

      I have used gimp for the better part of the last ten years. It’s good. I have used Photoshop less than ten times in the same timespan. But when I need to do something, it will always be easier to me on photoshop, eveh though I’m not acquainted with it…

      • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do wonder what differences in philosophy and development led to something like Blender to be pretty accepted even in pro circles?

        For me, personally, the moment I found out you can easily install a version of gimp that doesn’t distribute it’s tools and canvas across a dozen windows was when it began to feel “right” for me. Granted, I am only using it as an amateur for meme and touching up on graphics for game dev, but it feels right to me at least.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I barely use GIMP, but years ago I heard about it and gave it a go. It simultaneously opened three or four seemingly random windows and no actual workspace as far as I can tell. I immediately gave up. It wasn’t until recently that I had a reason to try again, and at this point I had forgotten the absurd situation I ran away from the first time. Luckily they’ve made some improvements since then. It’s still a bit obtuse, but I hear a big update is coming soon that might fix some of the UI issues?