• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox is safer and tbh, has probably the best UX and aesthetics out of anyone. Brave is garbage.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Firefox user, the only thing Brave does that I wish Firefox would copy is their fingerprinting resistance. I know Firefox does have fingerprinting resistance but it’s nowhere near the same level as Brave.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Firefox with RFP, Arkenfox user.js, Librewolf or Tor-Browser unifies your fingerprint. Its universal among users. Brave scrambles it, while some may say that is actually not a real fingerprint and can be detected, making you stand out extremely

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just to be clear, are you saying Firefox with fingerprinting resistance used in conjunction with Arkenfox user.js provides fingerprint unification, similar to what Tor browser does? I’ll have to check that out.

            I think both approaches are valid tbh. Having a unique fingerprint obviously uniquely identified you, but if it’s randomised then your browsing sessions can’t (in theory) be linked.

            • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Chameleon extension could solve some of the fingerprinting issues as it can randomize the browser and OS info that is sent.