I don’t usually post political stuff, but I don’t see ANYONE talking about this, and I really believe if we don’t do this, we will hand this country over to fascists.

Your vote matters. Most of you reading this know it. But the truth is that the left is HORRIBLE at getting out to vote. From what I’ve read, registered democrats outnumber repubs by 10-15%. Yet on average less then 70% vote. There exists an apathy towards voting in a portion of the left that assumes that they don’t need to vote because “who would vote for that idiot Trump?”. They assume it’s a done deal, and don’t bother.

THOSE are the people we need to target. We need to set up community activists whose only purpose is to make sure democrats either fill out a mail in ballot, or have a ride to the voting booths. Every democrat needs to take a friend or two with them. We need to make voting a communal act where we encourage, check up on, and practically insist on their vote.

I believe that if we DON’T do this, it WILL BE the END of democracy. We have the numbers. Now we just need to get them out to vote.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t believe how often I’m seeing this misunderstanding: Biden doesn’t have full authority to change the system of laws or function of the federal government.

    The SCOTUS decision simply gives him the power to commit crimes in official capacity without repercussions.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, this is wrong. They left the door open to almost literally ANY egregious interpretation of what an “official act” is. Voting seems like something a sitting President should be making more accessible to all. Pretty official to me, but who is to say I guess?

      Biden is fully free to let shit off the chain fly and force them to reign it in. Nobody can stop him in time for the election, so I really hope he fucking uses it.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It apparently DOES, because they didn’t define what “official acts” are. I could say scratching myself is an official act, or showing my tits is, or selling Presidential records or artifacts is when I keep the money. They left it completely open betting on the fact that Trump was going to win. Read the ruling, it’s open to insane interpretation for absolutely anything as long as you say “OFFICIAL ACT GOING ON HERE”.

          Same dumb shit these same assholes allowed for “stand your ground” states. If I think something is whatever I say it is, I’m free to do whatever the fuck I want about it, including killing people.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            JFC you don’t understand.

            Imagine this hypothetical: If I recruit you into the police force, give you a badge and a gun, and send you out without bullets: you still can’t shoot people. You’re legally allowed to shoot people in specific contexts, but you physically cannot because you have no ammo. In order for Biden to “Get Ammo” he would need someone to give it to him, e.g. the Senate. He has plenty of stuff to use, like a stun gun or a baton.

            Biden cannot change how the government functions, the laws as they apply to everyone, or how the federal budget is allocated or capped. He can have people beaten to death in their home as an official act, but he can’t rewrite the constitution.

    • mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      So if he doesn’t have the power to do those things, but does them anyway……that would be a crime, correct?

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No. It just doesn’t carry the power of law. There’s never been potential criminal liability for him writing executive orders beyond his powers. They simply get struck down.