• spongebue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And what history does NATO have of using their arms for offensive purposes, rather than defense?

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      A really big history… Take a peak at what countries are in nato and realize they have a long history of being directly in conflict with Russia/Soviet Union.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Or directly fighting them and having a 40 year long cold war. Maybe most of those countries have been in direct war with russia in recent memory.

          • spongebue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Or maybe Ukraine isn’t the aggressor here and Putin is proving why Ukraine wants to be in NATO

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ukraine is not the aggressor, I never said it was. What I will say is that this was was 100% preventable with the promise that Ukraine would not join nato. It was a known red line, and it was crossed. “BUT UKRAINE CAN DO WHAT IT WANTS!!!” Great, and NATO can directly say we dont want a conflict and we dont want Ukraine to be a part because we know it is a line that will likely trigger a war.