300 million lbs of fireworks and 2.7 billion dollars gone in a cloud of smoke.

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Objectively, so you have some data to back it up? Do you have the comparative carbon footprint of those shows?

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lmao are you being serious or do you lack basic logic, drones are reusable and put off zero emissions, fireworks are not reusable and put off a shit ton of emissions.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Zero emission at use, not at fabrication, probably not when recharging and not as electronic waste at the end. Yes, I am being serious, considering only emission during usage is a very limited view of what carbon footprint is. A view that is often used by companies for green washing. Do you also believe electric cars are zero emissions? Considering full life, knowing which one emits more is not trivial.

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are emissions in the production of fireworks as well. Drones can be recycled at the end of their life cycle, fireworks cannot be recycled. EVs ARE zero emission just like drones, they offset the emissions put out during their production after around 40k miles and are extremely energy efficient unlike combustible engines. An EV running on a coal fired electric grid puts off less emissions than a prius.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Batteries = genuinely bad.

          Also, energy doesn’t always come from clean sources, and even then, they do have footprint of their own.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Please stop with such language, we had enough of it on every mainstream platform.

        I genuinely call for civility here.

        As per the substance, as already mentioned, the production and later disposal of drones does have ecological footprint that is very much not negligible.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I wasn’t the one to claim that, and neither was the person who opposed you, from all I could see.

            There’s just not enough research/calculation done on drones vs. fireworks, and a lot has to be taken into consideration. How often are the drones used? Are they recycled at the end of life? Which materials are used in their production, and what is their source of energy? etc. etc.

            The advantage of fireworks is that they are very simple and use little materials to produce, most of which are safe (but some are not great).

            Drones, on the other hand, require a lot of lithium and cadmium, as well as other basic resources like metal/plastic, silicon etc., and some parts of their manufacturing involve high-end facilities that require a lot of resources to maintain correct conditions. All of this leads to high footprint of their manufacturing, and if you use such drone just a few times for some large-scale swarms and then forget about it for a while, this will get way less ecological than fireworks.

            Don’t get me wrong, the technology is good and drones can absolutely be a superior option. But this heavily depends on how they’re used.