• kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    except the church is literally not policed, how does it affect the church if your governnent employees can’t wear crosses to work?

    get a fucking grip.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do know when the constitution mentions the church, they aren’t being literal… The “church” is the institution of religious beliefs, which is made up of people. You are policing people’s rights to freely express their beliefs.

      Are you harmed by someone wearing a cross when they work?

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That sounds like more of a personal problem than an actual depiction of a problem in reality.

          I’m an atheist/agnostic, someone believing in some fake metaphysical being doesn’t affect me at all. What does affect me is when those people try to force their beliefs on me, and you seem to be hellbent on paving the way for them to do so.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you are right I am personally paving the way, because what I say on this platform dictates policy, lmao

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol, if you are now claiming your opinion holds no value or influence…why make a rebuttal in the first place?