• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m really confused about the “No one can have my picture but almost every single one of my male believers is going to carry my name” situation.

    Religions are kind of weird, aren’t they?

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Always has been. Religion is the single biggest reason to not believe in religion.

    • Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Really? Besides Muhammad, name 1 other well known person who showing a benign picture of him causes a real risk of getting killed by his fans?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        name 1 other well known person who showing a benign picture of him causes a real risk of getting killed by his fans?

        I’ve gotta say, I know quite a few Muslims and I can’t think of one who would so much as take a swing at me for running around in a big t-shirt with Muhammad’s face on it. Meanwhile, I can think of a few people who would take a swing at me if I was wearing, say, Osama Bin Laden.

  • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There once was a post on the Onion about a caricature of Christian, Judaist, Hindu and Buddhist gods having an orgy and no believers wishing death upon the author, but sighing and closing the tab instead.

      • halvar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        But like, that’s stupid they don’t expect us to eat halal why do they expect us not to depict their prophet?

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Basically they managed to convince a lot of people that drawing Mohammad is hate speech, while obviously such depictions do exist (especially those that also conflate having an Arabic decent with Islamism), it’s just certain fundamentalists won the free marketplace of ideas through bullying and terrorism.

          Despite all the legitimate critiques, it was a mistake to succumb, now Christian fundamentalists are trying the same, see the overreaction to the Olympics.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            now Christian fundamentalists are trying the same, see the overreaction to the Olympics.

            I’m OotL on the Shitlympics intentionally, what are the big babies crying about now?

            • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              People want to claim the drag performance was making fun of “The Last Supper” and the Gojira concert was “satanic”.

              • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                People want to claim the drag performance was making fun of “The Last Supper”

                By their own statements, that was their actual intention though.

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Pls don’t kill me for posting this. A holy warrior already smote the guy that drew it 🙏

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My question is, if it is supposedly abominable to show a picture of Mohamed, thus there are no extant pictures of him, how does the claim that any particular doodle of a guy in a turban with a beard actually is a depiction of Mohamed stand up to logical scrutiny? (That was a rhetorical question. I know my error was actually in including the word “logic.”)

      You can’t prove it’s actually him. This could just be the Continuing Adventures of Captain Bomb Hat, an individual completely unrelated.