• LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I AGREE, instead Kamala should do what Trump did and give us all multiple stimulus checks. Like how about every month. We can call it “Universal Basic Income.”

  • lettruthout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait… wasn’t he just giving a “press conference” about how grocery prices have gone up? If not price controls, what will hinder price gouging?

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        He will simply tell the companies they have to lower the prices, and they will say “no way” and he will say “way”.

        Problem solved.

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Only by giving massive amounts of no-strings-attached government money to Smithfield and ConAgra while lightly scolding them about shrinkflation can we address high grocery costs!

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Weren’t you paying attention? He’s not going to use price controls, he’s going to use container size controls.

      It can’t be communist if it’s big!

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        the shrinkflation shall continue until his tiny hands can wrap themselves around a can of diet coke.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well, we’re still waiting for the details on that “amazing” healthcare plan him and his team lied about having when they tried to repeal the Affordable Care Act, so I’m sure it’s just around the corner!

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did he actually say that? I just saw the dumbass holding up two sizes of tic tacs and idiotically proclaiming “tHiS iS iNfLaTioN”.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tax cuts for the elite. It will trickle down to cheaper groceries. Read the art of the deal already.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We need to De-Woke the agricultural sector. There are too many regulations. Not enough people can keep a cow in their back yard and sell milk to the neighbors.

      Retvrn to Tradition!

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    Kamala’s plan is some sort of vague “stop price gouging,” but Trumps plan is even vaguer. His plan was to hold a press conference next to some sausages and say that his administration would lower prices. He gave even fewer specifics.

    His actual plans are project 2025.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      He has no actual plans beyond “stay out of prison by going to the White House.”

      Project 2025 is the plan of all the people he’s going to appoint if he gets in.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Only words left in the conservative vocabulary: “Socialist” and “communist”

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Surely linking affordable groceries to communism will make affordable groceries less popular rather than communism more popular.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The reason publicly traded companies continually raise prices is the pressure from Wall Street to continually make more money than you did last month, last quarter, last year.

    Say you sell 1,000,000 hamburgers and make a 20% profit on it.

    Unless you make more money next year, selling that same 1,000,000 hamburgers, Wall Street is going to punish you. They don’t care that you’re profitable.

    You either sell more burgers or raise prices.

    • esc27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah. They treat profit like a necessary business expense or a cost, and balance their budgets around it. Which perverts a fundamental of economics.

      I’m starting to think the stock market is just a really awful bank that is sometimes also a ponzi scheme.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The stock market IS a ponzi scheme, and the embodiment or everything that’s wrong with capitalism. It encourages greed and drives enshittification. It’s a system by the wealthy, for the wealthy (like 90% of stock is owned by the richest 10%, and most of that is owned by the top 0.1%). Expectations of infinite growth on a planet with finite resources is insane.

        Most of the human population would prefer (and benefit from) less greed, less enshitification, cheaper housing, cheaper groceries, cheaper products — than the possibility to own a share of evilcorp.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or lower content, or use cheaper content, or fire people and make the people staying work 10% more for the same salary, … every year.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        A while back, Exxon set a record for any company in a quarter and everyone was going “Wooo!” and I was like “Well, gas prices are going up then… Think about next quarter and this quarter next year…”

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is because enough people don’t bother to price shop.

      They have to turn inventory or they will quickly go broke.

      If you switch to the cheaper option they have to react. If you shrug and pay, they win.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or complicit in the grift to steal more money from working americans. Or a fucking moron!

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Oh come on. The rhetoric is insane . I live in Florida and price gouging during a hurricane or other emergency is absolutely illegal here, there’s a hotline to call if you see it. There is a difference between raising prices because your costs have gone up, and price gouging. If the invisible hand of the market isn’t working (big surprise, ha) that’s what laws are for.

  • npz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I recall this recent quote from him at Bedminster when asked about his campaign strategy: “All I have to do is define her as a Communist or a Socialist or say she will destroy America.”

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    All this looks like a conflict on a stereotypical Middle-Eastern market.

    Two sides with the emotion of “munnat” in long words and exaggerated comparisons talking stuff about each other that doesn’t make sense, but nobody remembers it should even make sense.

    Republicans do more of that, but funny for both.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s because elections are won on emotions and vibes, not “boring” policies, unfortunately.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, but specific emotions and vibes that work or are used today are strange.

        Politicians used to imitate that proverbial craftsman that is starving first half of the day, or that proverbial worker class man with one pair of jeans with holes in them and dust grown into his skin, or that proverbial farmer that looks 40 in his 20, but all these somehow gotten to the top to be politicians, or at least a gentleman with good intentions.

        While now they play what I described.