It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • VulKendov@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    North American, more specifically US slavery is very recent relative to the rest of history and was deeply ingrained into the economy of half the United States. War broke out to abolish it and the effects of it are still felt today.

    Pretty much all races and people have been enslaved in history.

    Don’t deflect from the racism, discrimination, and prejudice that black Americans still experience to this day because of slavery.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe but the terms slave and master have nothing to do with that.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t deflect from the racism, discrimination, and prejudice that black Americans still experience to this day because of slavery.

      hate to be that guy but like, i feel like we should probably push for more POC to enter CS education fields, or like, improve the socioeconomic status of them, or like, crack down on discriminatory hiring practices, before we like. Start removing words because they feel moderately icky and make my skin crawl.

      • colon_capital_D@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why not both? We have the capacity to replace outdated/useless words and make the situation better for others. In fact, one does not prevent the other whatsoever

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          that’s also true. But seeing as this is a discussion primarily about removing terms from common parlance, i think it’s reasonable to focus on solely that aspect.

          Ultimately, i’m just not really convinced that doing this is going to be ultimately productive at the end of the day. I might be wrong i suppose. But i think i’d need to see some supporting data first.