• stormeuh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      IMO this should be the case for everything developed using public money, looking at you, pharmaceutical companies…

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The issue becomes when things are developed with a mix of public and private money. I’m not saying we shouldn’t tackle the issue, only that it can’t be as simple as public money = public resource. If that were true, nearly all of us would be required to work for free, since we got the majority of our education through public funding.

        Edit: It seems everyone ignored the generalization I was replying to. Yes, in terms of code it’s actually relatively easy to require that a publicity funded project be open source and leave it at that. The business can decide if they want to write everything from scratch to protect their IP or if they want to open up existing code as a part of fulfilling/winning the contact.

        In terms of other partially government funded projects, like the pharmaceutical example given, it’s much more difficult to say how much of the process and result are thanks to public funding. That’s really the only point I was trying to make, that it can get very hard to draw the line. With code, it can be relatively easy.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You can still pay people to write public code, though. Just because you can use it for free doesn’t mean it always has to be written for free. In some cases, sure, it can make more sense to have it for free if it’s a fully non-profit volunteer-run project, but that is not the only way to write open-source software. Talented developers are still talented, open-source or not.

        • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          govts print infinite money. All of us are working for free. Their fiat is credits for the company store.

          If you think funding projects is bad then the response is to support lobbying project owners to put in malware until FOSS is publically funded.

          All we have to do is verbally support it. And cheerlead when it occurs. We don’t actually have to actively do it. It’s a threat which is done in politics all the time.

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            If governments could print infinite money they would just pay themselves an infinite salary.

            Your fundamentals of economics is broken.

            • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              They have paid and are paying themselves a never ending salary. The printing is gradual and then all at once.

              We will reach infinity, make sure you get your hands on the infinity or trillion dollar note.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      But it will be written in Schwiizerdütch, so no one outside of Switzerland will understand it. I think it’s a dialect of Perl.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Your joke aside, which I thought was funny did remind me that as it happens, the Swiss do an amazing job in making things internationally accessible.

        Take for example their spectrum management system that not only allows you to search for categories of users, handles kHz to MHz data entry, gives access to the legal provisions and then the legislation itself, does so in four languages.

        https://www.ofcomnet.ch/#/fatTable

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the way it should be. Governments around the world have spent decades enriching big tech with public money, when they could have pooled their resources and built FOSS software that benefited everyone.

    Same goes for science and everything else funded by tax payers.

  • nerdschleife@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Meanwhile my country’s apps don’t let you open them if you have Developer Options enabled on android :)

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wwwaiiiiiittt… So does this mean OS too? Is an entire country switching to the dark side? Linux, I mean Linux

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Been contracting for the Swiss government for years, namely ASTRA. They have 0 concept of how that should happen. It’s their IP, but they don’t want to take it, host it, maintain it, or do anything else with it once the project is done.

    Do they just expect others to foot the bill? Sure, free GitHub exists, but everything else? Open sourcing without maintenance is abandonware and usually useless.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In contrast, abandoned open source software can be picked up and updated by whomever gets paid to, where abandoned closed source software needs to be reimplemented from scratch at great expense to the tax payer.

      Not only that, open source software can be adopted by the community (who already paid for the development through their taxes) for their own purposes. Consider for example the productivity impact on business that starts using tools that it cannot afford to develop itself.

      Office things like document management, workflow management, accounting, but also tools used in the science community, transport and logistics, anything that government does is represented in some other way in society.

      This is a big deal and I hope that it will reverberate across the globe and become the new normal.

      Whilst we’re at it, consider the impact of open data, where government datasets are available to the community.

    • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Step 1: all software has to be open source

      Step 2: governments, required by law, to fund FOSS projects in their tech stacks. Helped by organizations which trace project funding and lobbying to promote FOSS security by providing funding; a huge incentive to not insert malware

      Step 3: coders are afforded dignity (UBI); given funds geared towards affording a maintenance team. Regardless of country of origin. Vital infrastructure is vital infrastructure. Talent is talent.

      I support this move to Step 1

      Where is the list of pauper gov’ts which force talent to get a job rather than be a talent and then maintain their projects with dignity!

      Those jobs are mostly nonsense. Geared towards wasting our time building:

      • yet another stupid web site

      • yet another stupid smartphone app

      • yet another stupid cloud base server instance

      • Citizen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yup and then they move the spyware/malware/etc into a layer below where nobody knows what is inside…

        How is your baseband modem in your smartphone doing, by the way?

        • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          this is why FOSS community goes ahead and removes untrustworthy blobs and replaces them with open source alternatives.

          The open hardware is an issue, but there are efforts there as well.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This makes me curious in the US on whether or not government app source code would be provided via a FOIA request.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’d think so, but the answer is no. They’ve employed companies like Microsoft, Oracle, etc. to write up the security handbooks that says proprietary software is more secure. Heck, even electronic voting systems in the US is closed-source.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Simply, you can’t. I’m personally all for an open source alternative for electronic voting. I can bank online, but not vote online. I’d trust an open source online voting platform more than I’d trust poll workers to not skew some votes. I’d also like to be able to track my vote and ensure it was cast for the person I voted for.