• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Japanese company applying Japanese law to global consumers. This needs to stop. Its fine to apply Japanese law in Japan to Japanese consumers, but not other countries.

    Nintendo, I used to love you, and now you are the single biggest contributor to me hating you.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately that’s only gonna stop when social media companies enable country blocking for streamers to prevent their content from being shown to Japanese audiences.

      • Arbiter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You really think they would stop in that case?

        Nintendo is writing their own laws through terms of service, enforced with kill switches built into their games.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          They can’t write their own laws and their terms of service can’t go against your local laws if they want to provide their services in your State (in the general sense, not in the USA sense), so customer protection laws can solve the issue if Nintendo won’t solve it themselves.

          • Bezier@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            They absolutely shouldn’t be able to, but companies are constantly pushing the boundaries and seem to be getting away with their bullshit bullshit depressingly often.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Supposedly this is how the animetuber community were able to get relief from copy strikes after TNM took a public stand against the practice when his one piece series got struck

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s as if customer protection laws are necessary… A whole bunch of things found in EULA doesn’t apply to me just because of where I live and the fact that we have them here.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nintendo, knows they can coerce YouTube into destroying peoples channels, by sung them in Japan, so they get to write any rules they want.

    • mormund@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure how Japanese law has anything to do with this. I’m pretty sure under US law (the one that ultimately matters for streaming) leaves all the rights of recorded videos of the game with the right holders of the game. That you’re allow to record/stream games at all has no legal precedent, it’s just a wise business decision by publisher to not forbid it (anymore).

      And legality aside. As a dev I wouldn’t want racist or bigoted streamers to show my game and make money off of my work. Same with leakers. Sure for a big company I don’t care but if someone leaked an indie devs work, we would consider it a dick move as well.