• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I know certain sentiments are coming, so I’ll put this here: Three Mile Island wasn’t the unmitigated disaster that fearmongers would have you believe. It was an ultimately harmless accident that was highly publicized because of poor communication and irresponsible sensationalist journalism.

    More on the topic: https://youtu.be/cL9PsCLJpAA

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I thought the Netflix show was pretty clear it wasn’t as bad as popular history made it out to be.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Posted this earlier:

      A poof of radioactive steam let loose. That’s it, the whole incident. People freaked out on March 28, 1979.

      In totally unrelated news, The China Syndrome, a popular movie about a reactor meltdown, came out March 16, 1979.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It was actually a success story. It failed safe, as designed.

      Unfortunately “The China Syndrome” really pumped up anti-nuclesr sentiment.

      TMI was the opposite of Chernobyl.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Heh, you see my posts? That movie came out not 2-weeks ahead of 3-Mile. Freaky isn’t it?

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yep. And underscoring that more than almost anything else is the fact that the TMI facility continued to operate without incident for forty years after that accident.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Nuclear” sounds scary but it doesn’t have to be and generally isn’t. There are currently 94 active nuclear reactors in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States

      IMHO, the correct take on “<blank> uses enormous amounts of energy” is “yes, we do need to invest more in renewable and clean energy”. Anyone who didn’t have their head in the sand could have known that last century. This is only a problem now because our political leaders have failed us, year after year, decade after decade.