• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The seller can mandate a signature. I’ve had to sign for valuables like laptops, phones and ammo. (That last one was to prove I’m American.)

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So it’s possibly cheaper for the seller not to require a signature (since it’s an extra service), but it’s no biggie if the package gets stolen? Seems logical…

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well yeah, if it only gets stolen 1% of the time, and the cost of that service is more than the replacement cost when things get stolen, it makes sense to not require a signature. It’s just like retail, they just factor in a certain amount of loss into the price of the items they sell.

        • kamen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Fair point, yeah. If it’s a no-hassle process for the customer to report something as stolen (even without proof - because I figure not everybody has surveillance cameras), sure.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The other thing that’s quite common is to require proof of delivery. Always fun because now the delivery driver has to take an awkward photo of me holding the box.