buckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoREPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up1746arrow-down18 cross-posted to: linustechtips@lemmit.online
arrow-up1738arrow-down1external-linkREPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.combuckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square209fedilink cross-posted to: linustechtips@lemmit.online
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down5·edit-21 month ago Don’t just give the extortionists more money Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down6·1 month agoDo you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
minus-squarePetter1@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 month agoDevelopment is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.
minus-squaremannycalavera@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 month agoIf it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not? This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoThey would need a new core design
minus-squareSaltySalamander@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoWonder how long that’d take, hmm?
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 month agoBy that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoYou have not read the article.
Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.
If it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not?
This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
They would need a new core design
Wonder how long that’d take, hmm?
By that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
You have not read the article.