cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22940159

Bernie Sanders caused a stir last week, when the independent senator from Vermont and two-time contender for the Democratic presidential nomination sent a post-election email to his progressive supporters across the country. In it, he argued that the Democrats suffered politically in 2024 at least in part because they ran a campaign that focused on “protecting the status quo and tinkering around the edges.”

In contrast, said Sanders, “Trump and the Republicans campaigned on change and on smashing the existing order.” Yes, he explained, “the ‘change’ that Republicans will bring about will make a bad situation worse, and a society of gross inequality even more unequal, more unjust and more bigoted.”

Despite that the reality of the threat they posed, Trump and the Republicans still won a narrow popular-vote victory for the presidency, along with control of the US House. That result has inspired an intense debate over the future direction not just of the Democratic Party but of the country. And the senator from Vermont is in the thick of it.

In his email, Sanders, a member of the Senate Democratic Caucus who campaigned in states across the country this fall for Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic ticket, asked a blunt question: “Will the Democratic leadership learn the lessons of their defeat and create a party that stands with the working class and is prepared to take on the enormously powerful special interests that dominate our economy, our media and our political life?”

His answer: “Highly unlikely. They are much too wedded to the billionaires and corporate interests that fund their campaigns.”

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I mean, running as a progressive within the Democratic Party already means you have to fight both parties. You have to fight the Democratic Party during the primaries, and you have to fight Republicans if Democrats somehow fail to keep you from winning the primaries. If you do win the primaries, you cannot count on the support of the Democratic Party in the general, as they prefer the Republican to beat you so they can run a centrist next time.

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Then people need to abandon the DNC and form another option. Reform from within is fantasy, the current power structure will never allow anything that’s a threat to their existence

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        How do you plan to avoid the problem of abandoning the DNC causing Republicans, who are worse than Democrats, from gaining unmitigated power while said other party is gaining momentum?

        • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Republicans are only worse in their rhetoric. They will openly declare their intent, then do it. Democrats omit the declaring part.

          Protecting the status quo prolongs everyone’s suffering

          • Anomaline@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah, me getting to use the bathroom is just a rhetorical distraction in the end.

            Go back to your hole, .ml troll

          • lengau@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Only one of the two major parties helped ensure that a good friend of mine had legal access to lifesaving healthcare recently, and it wasn’t Republicans. Pretending one party isn’t worse isn’t productive. How are you going to approach the spoiler effect, or do you simply not care about all the death and suffering that will result from strategy that doesn’t tackle the spoiler effect?

            • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              The spoiler is running right wing candidates posing as liberal. Both times the DNC has done that we got trump.

              • lengau@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                Words have meanings. If you don’t want to answer the question because you’re embarrassed of the fact that you care for political purity over the lives of others, that’s on you.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  They’re just here to cosplay as revolutionaries. They don’t give a fuck about the people who actually suffer under these regimes.

                • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  The only thing that is embarrassing is liberals thinking their candidates are progressive

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Republicans are demonstrably worse than Democrats. Neither care about the poor, but one of them actively tries to kill queer folk, many of whom are good friends of mine, so fuck those Republican assholes.

            The Democrat assholes at least aren’t directly targeting the people I care about, it’s just collateral.

            • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Democrats kill them via social murder, which is a direct act of violence against all marginalized communities. Liberals claim they support trans using the restroom of choice, but don’t care if they live on the streets to make that decision.

          • lengau@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Right now I live in a state with a Democratic governor, a Democratic state senate, and a Democratic majority on the state supreme court. And these three things are preventing major catastrophes here. So no, this has not already happened, and what I have to lose here is quite literally my life.

              • lengau@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                If the Republican party regains power in my state, my life is in danger. Even if I were so selfish as to only care about having “got mine,” that non-sequitur would still be irrelevant.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        “you can’t blame the voter! The DNC is at fault for not changing”

        – literally any 3rd party lemming after the election


        “Then people need to abandon the DNC and form another option.”

        – literally any 3rd party lemming after the election


        so which is it? can we blame the voters or can’t we?

        • Jentu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          If the voters are too apathetic to what the DNC is offering, the thought of abandoning them for something that is much more popular isn’t a contradictory prospect. Having an enthusiasm problem so big that trump was able to be elected twice kinda points to the fact that people want something else.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Dan Osborne ran competitively in a neglected Nebraska Senate race. It’s very common for Dems to entirely neglect seats, even whole states, and let winnable races languish.

      Sanders candidates can (and did) win races like this in 2018 and 2020. The problem is that once a seat is “winnable”, lobbyists state money bombing primaries. Then you get shitty corporate Dems pushing leftists out and promptly losing those seats again.