• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    21 days ago

    Politicians have ensured that there is no peaceful, legal pathway to reform. That’s why this happened.

    Isn’t there going to be a very big change to US government come january?

    • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 days ago

      Honestly, simply put, imo, no. The same rich and powerful are going to be in charge then. Even more so. I’d argue that the incoming government even guarantees that there’s no peaceful, legal, pathway to reform.

    • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      And what are they gonna do except continue to line their pockets while we all suffer.

      Most armed country in the world. Continue to fuck around and you will find out. I can’t believe it took this long.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      Isn’t there going to be a very big change to US government come january?

      Towards authoritarianism and dictatorship and away from democracy, yes.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 days ago

        So change is possible if you gather sufficient votes?

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 days ago

          In the US? No.

          https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

          Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 days ago
              Isn’t there going to be a very big change to US government come january?
              

              Towards authoritarianism and dictatorship and away from democracy, yes.

              • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 days ago

                but if the president wears different pants than the previous president that goes to show voting can affect change

            • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 days ago

              how can someone be so lacking in nuance? your world is so black and white lol.

              my guy, you really need to think through things more, you’re so simple it’s mind boggling

              • iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                20 days ago

                So black and white that I don’t manage to appreciate murder, apparently :)

                In my way, I see that as a good thing.

                • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  you haven’t responded to the myriad comments pointing out when we feel it’s justified to kill someone, like defending yourself and others or at times of war.

                  So, what’s your stance?

                  • iii@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    20 days ago

                    Even in self defense, to me, killing someone is last resort.

                    I get robbed at gunpoint: i give them my wallet.

                    I get attacked for reasons beyond my control (gaybashing for example): i’d try to run, as it’s usually a group of people. I’d cry for help. I’d try to inflict enough pain to get away.

                    I’m at war. I don’t want to be at war. I also noticed people larping here, like they want to be in a war. To me that’s crazy.

                    I get wormholed back to baby hitler: Wouldn’t kill him. Would encourage him often to persue arts.

                    More specific to this case: it’s not self defense if you stalk a person then kill them, in my opinion.

                    That’s incel turned rapist/murderer thinking, in my opinion.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m sure Trump’s concepts of a plan will fix healthcare in this country. Yup, definitely should have just waited for daddy Trump to give the healthcare industry a spanking. He’s definitely not a slimy conman who will just let the insurance industry line his pockets like every other politician.