• paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was having a hard time imagining which company this could be. Not that I’m a fan of Verizon or Comcast, but I think they know what side their bread is buttered on. Which one wouldn’t?

    Then I remembered Starlink exists.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      170
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t think they were colluding with the provider. They probably just put a burner sim card into a 4g module and sent data over a VPN to China whenever it had signal.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The blurb says primarily for navigation.

        So it was using the starlink signals like gps signal and therefore they needed to correlate with the carrier to get a rough time sync.

        I wonder what timing data is freely available on the starlink acquisition signal.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Why would they need data then? With GPS can get a 1metre accurate chip for like 20 bucks and it’s way smaller. And no need for any carrier or subscription.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Mapping out network topology? Who knows.

            Whatever the collected data was, it could have been sent to their satellites for long haul back home.

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a satellite provider. Cell networks don’t work at that altitude. Starlink was my first guess too but, after some more thought, it could be Hughesnet. They probably have wider coverage.