• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s perfectly in their rights, but not what an effort seeking to prevent a Trump candidacy should want.

    • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If the state ruled Trump can’t be on the primary ballot because he’s ineligible to be president, then he can’t be on the main ballot because he’s ineligible to be president. That means no Republican will be on the ballot, and that’s really bad for the Republicans.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Trump missing from the ballot in Colorado and Maine would not make a difference, they don’t vote Republican in the general election anyway.

        You’d need this to happen in a vaguely competitive state. Judging from the progress of various attempts, that doesn’t seem likely, unless the supreme Court declared it nationally, but I don’t see that happening even if they let Colorado and Maine stand.

        So you have got a bunch of Trump die hards inspired to “fight like hell” in the face of what they describe as an injustice, all to block him in a state he wasn’t going to win anyway.

        Now if you pulled this off in some place like Georgia, Florida, Texas, then sure, that would be quite the blow and may persuade the GOP voters to really around some other candidate that would be more tolerable. But Colorado and Maine aren’t going to really help general election results.