• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is actually hilarious, in a very dark tragic comedy sort of way.

    The feature scans and categorizes important documents e.g. passports, IDs, etc., and it’s a feature of Google’s official Files app.

    Instead of dropping support and phasing it out, they’re going to kill it and DELETE all of those critical documents for users.

    JFC. Awesome.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      Note that this is only about the copy made into the important tab. I do still agree it’s a stupid way if doing it, but they’re not deleting the original that was imported, just the import-copy.

      • narrowide96lochkreis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Could it happen that you already deleted the original file because you thought, well I have it in the important tab, but now will lose that copy when Google removes that tab and be left empty handed? Not sure how this tab works

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Google: hey, let us scan all of your most important documents. We’ll mark them as important for you.

      You: um… Okay. I guess that could be useful. I just hope you don’t record all of that information.

      Google: okay, we recorded all of your most important documents, so now we’re deleting them. Ta ta!

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      @circuscritic Security wise, it does make sense. Supposedly, you still have these documents in original (edit: I mean, in physical format), and you can scan them once again how many times you want. I imagine it would be worse to simply decrypt these and leave them in a random folder somewhere on users’ phones in plain sight, available to any app that would read them.

      There are plenty of options for encrypting your files anyway.

      @FragmentedChicken

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I imagine it would be worse to simply decrypt these and leave them in a random folder somewhere on users’ phones in plain sight, available to any app that would read them.

        Why, did it encrypt and then delete the files that it detected as important when it scanned the device? That’s just even worse.

        • petrescatraian@libranet.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          @ReversalHatchery I don’t have access to the feature but I’m assuming the option was rather opt-in? And now they’re sending notifications to everyone affected, so it’s not like it’s doing anything the users are unaware.

          I do agree they could have better explained the reason they’re choosing to delete the documents instead of decrypting them.