When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    maybe you won the geographic lottery and live in a good state

    I live in Indiana.

    and have the right to vote

    Why yes, I am a citizen and an adult and not a felon. What’s your point?

    and are getting paid more

    I am unemployed.

    and have extra rights

    Such as?

    and bodily autonomy

    Well yes, I’m male. That’s not my fault. I can’t make abortion legal again.

    I’m not going to go past that. Maybe you can reassess your completely false image of me and we can continue.