willya@lemmyf.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoLeave it alonelemmyf.ukimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1821arrow-down131
arrow-up1790arrow-down1imageLeave it alonelemmyf.ukwillya@lemmyf.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareMoops@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-21 year agoI mean, runtimes can be a legit reason to say something’s not working.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoBut it does work. Eventually. Really, I fixed it because we’re doing an OS upgrade and I didn’t want to wait 2h every time I spun up a new instance to test a change.
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agothat’s the problem with the ‘its working’ argument. if you hadn’t touched the working code you might have missed the performance issue to begin with.
I mean, runtimes can be a legit reason to say something’s not working.
But it does work. Eventually.
Really, I fixed it because we’re doing an OS upgrade and I didn’t want to wait 2h every time I spun up a new instance to test a change.
that’s the problem with the ‘its working’ argument.
if you hadn’t touched the working code you might have missed the performance issue to begin with.