Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    10 months ago

    Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

    Understand. Please tell Disney that they no longer own Mickey Mouse.

    • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Again, I literally already said that it’s a problem.

      IP law is also different than granting rights to corporations. Corporations SHOULD be allowed to own IP, provided they’ve compensated the creator.

        • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          10 months ago

          Honestly, yes. I’m ok with that. People are not entitled to be able to do anything they want with someone else’s IP. 90 years is almost reasonable. Cut it in half and I’d also consider it fairly reasonable.

          I’m all for expanding copyright for individuals and small companies (small media companies, photographers who are incorporated, artists who make money based on commissions, etc) and reducing it for mega corps, but there’s an extremely fine line around that.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
            13·
            10 months ago

            Well I am not. If the goal is to promote artistic creation it should not follow inheritance. Heck it shouldn’t even be 45 years. No one at Disney was alive when Mickey was made therefore it should be public domain.

            Once you fix that let me know.