How Much Does It Cost to Charge an Electric Vehicle? (A comparison at home and on the road, with gasoline)::Few people know what a kilowatt-hour costs them, so they don’t realize how cheap EV home charging is versus gasoline. On the road, it’s more complicated.

  • zoe @infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    EV home charging is cheap, but it costs us the environement: using utility electricity generated from coal non renewables sources (fossil, nuclear) plants (so is supercharging)

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gasoline comes from oil. Electricity comes from coal. Or oil. Or natural gas. Or nuclear. Or hydro. Or wind. Or solar. Or hamsters running on wheels. The renewable options are there and they’re only becoming more prevalent.

      Also, power plants scale much better at producing large amounts of energy more efficiently than a bunch of tiny little engines make a car go. So sure, coal plays a part in feeding an electric car, but if you’re going to advocate against it anyway you’re missing the bigger picture.

      • zoe @infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        i ll edit my comment to ‘fossil and non renewables (nuclear)’ instead of ‘coal’. if u check my comment history, i am really just parroting the same idea for a while now, and decided to choose the word coal, albeit inaccurate, just to get my point through…

        • projectd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you realise that you’re parroting the same thing all over the place and you know it’s probably not accurate? Here’s a challenge for you - approach this topic like something you’ve not researched before without your existing opinions and try and reach an answer as to whether electric cars are better or worse for the environment by being as scientific and objective as possible.

          Because I keep coming across comments similar to yours, I have taken that same challenge myself to make sure I’m on the right track and there was a lack of compelling sources suggesting that electric cars are worse for the environment.

          I invite everyone with the alternative view to the same challenge.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have seen your comments before. They show you lack a basic understanding of EV charging and when you get called out over basic points like “most people don’t need to charge their full battery capacity every night” you ignore it.

          At least you made this reply.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      EV home charging is cheap, but it costs us the environement: using utility electricity generated from coal plants (so is supercharging)

      Only 8 states in the USA still generate the majority of the their electricity from coal. Its none of the big populated ones.

      Coal use continues to decline in the USA while renewables continue to increase:

      source

      • zoe @infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        the rest is whether: nuclear, or fossil, which all are finite and non renewables. only a small fraction are renewables

        • DarkShaggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not true. Near 50% for CA. One of the largest stars in the USA.

          2022, renewable resources, including hydroelectric power and small-scale, customer-sited solar power, accounted for 49% of California’s in-state electricity generation. Natural gas fueled another 42%. Nuclear power supplied almost all the rest.

          https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#:~:text=In 2022%2C renewable resources%2C including,California’s in-state electricity generation.

          • zoe @infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The world doesn’t revolve only around CA. what about the rest of the world, where EVs are used ?

            • Shaolin Shrimp@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well here’s the data for my country:

              According to official data, Scotland broke previous records by generating 35.3TWh of renewable electricity in 2022, marking a 28.1% increase from 2021 and 9.8% from 2020.

              This amount of electricity could power all households in Scotland for over three years.

                • Marruk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Do you understand how much effort you’re putting into being “right” rather than having an actual discussion?

                  For context, you started with “EV is bad because it uses coal”, implying that it is worse than ICE vehicles (somehow).

                  Then you had to change it to “EV is bad because it uses non-renewable energy.”

                  Then you had to change it to “EV is bad because it uses non-renewable energy and renewable energy, but not really much renewable energy.”

                  Then you had to change it to “EV is bad because outside of California, which doesn’t count (for some reason), it uses non-renewable energy and renewable energy, but not really much renewable energy.”

                  Now that someone is pointing out that other places besides California use significant amounts of renewable energy, your argument has become “I only will accept arguments that provide citations, even though my own various, shifting arguments, have provided none.”

                  This is in no way a good look for you.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The gas you burn in a car is 100% carbon-based. The energy in your home is usually not. It’s a mix of carbon-based and renewables. Also, your local coal plant is much more energy-efficient than your engine which probably hasn’t been tuned up in years.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if you have an EV charging on a shitty coal power plant, it’s still vastly more efficient than putting a small, personal power plant in a car and carrying around gasoline to burn. A modern EV uses the equivalent of about 3 gallons of gas to go 300 miles.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And has a lot more torque, is quieter, doesn’t need to turn off, etc. It amazes me how much resistance there is to EVs when they’re superior in a lot of ways. Not all, but they’re making huge strides quickly.

          Personally, I can’t wait to see the end of big oil’s iron grip on transportation. They’ve lied to us all for decades and gotten away with it for far too long. It’s time they pay up.

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think big oil is behind a lot of the resistance to EVs in a subtle way. For example, my conservative neighbor the other day was complaining about the weight of EVs compared to ICE cars, and how they’re damaging the roads. That sort of talking point doesn’t just arise naturally. I’m sure it was a coordinated messaging push by ICE car manufacturers and oils and gas stake holders, ultimately aiming at reduced EV adoption and a reduction in taxes on gasoline.

            Maybe I’m just a conspiracy theorist, but my bullshit alarm went off immediately at the idea of those types of ideas popping into the public consciousness organically.

            • kalleboo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              For example, my conservative neighbor the other day was complaining about the weight of EVs compared to ICE cars

              If they’re so concerned about vehicle weight, I’m sure they’re driving a compact car instead of a truck or SUV, right?

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if 100% of EV charging was by burning oil/coal, the power plants still manage this with greater efficiency than the internal combustion engine on your car. That means that even at it’s worst, it’s still way more environmentally friendly to drive an EV.

    • megalodon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This argument makes no sense. ICE cars have no option other than fossil fuels. Charging at home the electricity will at least be from some renewable sources, and the percentage is always increasing.

    • MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all countries use legacy energy sources. Iceland is 100% renewables (hydroelectric and geothermal) and Quebec is 100% hydroelectric…

    • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are aware that internal combustion engines also use non-renewables at a much lower efficiency than grid-scale use of non-renewables, right?

      Were you aware that only ~1/3 the energy from combustion is harnessed for propulsion in a traditional ICE?

      • zoe @infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        probably even 1/4…an EV charged from fossil electricity saves only 33% on emissions compared to a fossil car. personally if i am paying 40k$ for an EV i am expecting my purchase to act as a contribution to safeguard the environement, not only to save on repair costs and mileage, but thats my personal preference… a Tesla costs 40k$ at least, while a 40kwh nissan leaf costs 30k$, and there s no in-between, EVs are a pass for me for now but thats my opinion.

        • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          an EV charged from fossil electricity saves only 33% on emissions compared to a fossil car

          Or, stated more honestly, an EV deriving electricity from even fossil-based grid-scale generation uses roughly half the raw combustables as an ICE with the added benefit of emission scrubbing.

          if i am paying 40k$ for an EV i am expecting my purchase to act as a contribution to safeguard the environement

          We are fortunate, then, that this is already the case.

          EVs are a pass for me for now but thats my opinion.

          I’m not sure how you’ve determined they should be a pass - if you’re comparing like to like and comparing to new ICE vehicles of similar capability, there’s no reason not to go EV for most people.

          But sure, it is a matter of preference.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m glad you’ve pointed out that we haven’t solved every single problem at the same time. We never would have known without this blazing insight.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless you have a dedicated source of renewable energy that does not feed excess back into the grid, all the electricity you use has the exact same mix of fossil and renewable as the grid you’re connected to.

      That is an argument for improving the fuel sources used by the grid, not an argument against switching to things that can physically be powered by renewables.

      • zoe @infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Megapacks can be used to phase out fossil plants and avoid excess electricity, thus growing the share of renewable sources in the energy mix. a 4Mwh Megapack costs about 1.4M$, ie 350$ per kwh

    • ciaocibai@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait so the NZ government is lying to me about our renewable energy sources? And my home solar panels are just faking the energy production? Or did you forget the world is more than just that place you live in?