pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 days agoCommitsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1740arrow-down16 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1734arrow-down1imageCommitsh.itjust.workspastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 days agomessage-square34fedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days ago I’m kinda planning on teaching my team I’m not going to deal with their git issues for them. These two statements contradict each other.
minus-squareJustAnotherKay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoI disagree. I don’t wanna deal with my coworkers work, so I’m teaching them to deal with it themselves. Not necessarily in the best way for them to do it, but in an easy way to teach and an easy way to get right
minus-squareJesus_666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoThat’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first. Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.
These two statements contradict each other.
I disagree. I don’t wanna deal with my coworkers work, so I’m teaching them to deal with it themselves. Not necessarily in the best way for them to do it, but in an easy way to teach and an easy way to get right
That’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first.
Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.