filtering things through a chatbot is not at all helpful, we’ve seen how useless they are at identifying actual problems and issues, and it risks actually ignoring the unique concerns of the common people. It just receives feedback and spits it out in a slightly reliable manner. Although it could be just used for those things, and while it could be useful in some cases, erasing autonomous elements within a democratic system is not indicative toward a better society. Advocating for using a capitalist LLM to start replacing government functions is a catering to neoliberal and liberal elements.
They should be focusing more on cracking down on capitalist elements instead of seeing the US implementing bullshit and then say “we need to do that oh my goodness”. There’s definitely a liberal ideological bloc in china that absolutely worships the USA, and is deeply seated within the communist party. They should be focusing on implementing a democratically planned economy with computerized elements to solve the economic calculation problem.
That’s why there’s still the manual validation step with the randomly sampled set
Thats of course with the first implementation, but no matter it will increase its role within the government and start ‘streamlining’ relying on well known unreliable chat LLMs.
also, they are doing multiple things at once. not everybody is going to only focus on anti corruption
im not saying anti-corruption, im saying restoring a socialist economy and socialist government.
but no matter it will increase its role within the government and start ‘streamlining’ relying on well known unreliable chat LLMs.
That’s a big assumption that the government officials will necessarily become morons due to their decision to use Deep seek in ways that we don’t even know
That’s a big assumption that the government officials will necessarily become morons due to their decision to use Deep seek in ways that we don’t even know
its a big assumption to say that there wont be significant errors from incorporation of a glorified chatbot into governance will be helpful
filtering things through a chatbot is not at all helpful, we’ve seen how useless they are at identifying actual problems and issues, and it risks actually ignoring the unique concerns of the common people. It just receives feedback and spits it out in a slightly reliable manner. Although it could be just used for those things, and while it could be useful in some cases, erasing autonomous elements within a democratic system is not indicative toward a better society. Advocating for using a capitalist LLM to start replacing government functions is a catering to neoliberal and liberal elements.
They should be focusing more on cracking down on capitalist elements instead of seeing the US implementing bullshit and then say “we need to do that oh my goodness”. There’s definitely a liberal ideological bloc in china that absolutely worships the USA, and is deeply seated within the communist party. They should be focusing on implementing a democratically planned economy with computerized elements to solve the economic calculation problem.
That’s why there’s still the manual validation step with the randomly sampled set
also, they are doing multiple things at once. not everybody is going to only focus on anti corruption
Thats of course with the first implementation, but no matter it will increase its role within the government and start ‘streamlining’ relying on well known unreliable chat LLMs.
im not saying anti-corruption, im saying restoring a socialist economy and socialist government.
That’s a big assumption that the government officials will necessarily become morons due to their decision to use Deep seek in ways that we don’t even know
its a big assumption to say that there wont be significant errors from incorporation of a glorified chatbot into governance will be helpful