U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered a suspension of all military aid to Ukraine, escalating pressure on President Volodymyr Zelensky mere days after a heated exchange in the Oval Office cast doubt on U.S. support for Kyiv.

A senior Defense Department official told Bloomberg that all U.S. military assistance to Ukraine is on hold until Trump determines that Ukrainian leaders are making a genuine effort toward peace.

The pause affects not only future aid but also weapons already in transit, including shipments on aircraft and ships, as well as equipment awaiting transfer in Poland.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: changed source from Bloomberg to Kyiv Independent b/c there’s no paywall and more detail in the story.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have not a lot of knowledge how American politics work, but isn’t this for congress to decide? how is Trump so powerful? (sorry for my daft question)

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It is for Congress to decide such matters. It says so right in our constitution, but our Legislative branch has been ceding their ability to check Executive overreach for decades. Now, with a complicit Congress as the majority, they will never challenge Trump on anything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or illegal it might be. Same goes for the Judiciary as well, chock full of partisan hacks who bend and twist their interpretation of the language of the constitution to cherry pick a favorable ruling for anything that Trump does.

      Basically, our system of checks and balances that are meant to keep one aspect of the government from becoming too powerful has been completely subsumed by ideologues who prefer monarchy to democracy. The executive now essentially has unchecked authority and is in full control of the government apparatus.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We are entering a “yeah and who’s going to stop me era of US politics”

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s very illegal. He has already been impeached once for withdrawing military aid to Ukraine in his first term.

      And you see where that got us.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The president was always able to stop aid under certain conditions. Trump is just going to certify that one of those conditions exist no matter how ridiculous it is.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It isn’t daft. The Republicans since Reagan have pushed a fringe legal theory called the Unitary Executive Theory. Basically, they want the president to fully control the executive branch and military such that theirs is the only voice that matters for much of the government. Not unlike a king, but partially checked by congress and the courts. They have been taking (illegal) actions to try to get sued, and also have been suing others/other branches of government, to try to get the Supreme Court to hear cases that will support this fringe legal theory so that it becomes the law of the land.

      I am not a lawyer, but this is possibly something Trump can legally do since he is Commander in Chief of the armed forces. However, this seems more like an apportionment thing, which is Congress’ responsibility. Congress has allocated funds to send military aid to Ukraine. So, even if Trump as Commander in Chief could say “no more weapons to ukraine”, it seems doubtful to me that he could (legally) stop weapons shipments currently en route.

      But, by the time whatever government office sues the office of the president to get a judge to enjoin them to send the agreed upon weapons that were already apportioned, it will already have hurt Ukraine somewhat. Trump often weaponizes inefficiency. And these sort of illegal acts aren’t crimes per se - they’re just procedural breaches - the legal remedy is just to reverse the action.

      So, probably not legal. But Trump gets to weaponize his administration’s incompetence (or feigned incompetence) to at least delay aid. More competent people may support these actions, knowing they’re illegal, to try and strengthen the president’s role even further.

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The answer is simpler than that: the “checks and balances” system is a facade created to prevent meaningful progressive policy from passing. There’s a reason why Trump can modify a billion laws from day 1, but poor Biden couldn’t possibly do anything to codify abortion as a right or prevent the bombing of children in Gaza.

          • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            This isn’t quite right. Trump didn’t really modify laws. That isn’t even something he can claim to do since he is the head of the Executive branch, not the Legislative one. He issued executive orders, many of which were illegal, and he had some cronies who enacted some of them anyway - others did not enact some of these. He did rescind many policies, but he can’t just make laws go away on his own. There are literally hundreds of court cases currently challenging these executive orders - seeing as how the judiciary is the primary check on the executive branch, that is the system working to check presidential power.

            However, I am not a liberal, I am a socialist and do not think this is working well - there are many problems here. The highest levels of the judiciary have been largely captured by far-right judges, many of whom are specifically aligned with Trump’s goals and support the unitary executive theory. Also, this method of checking presidential power is extremely slow. For every illegal action Trump’s administration takes, a court case has to be crafted, filed, heard, and adjudicated. Every one. And invariably, some will not reach the correct outcome and others will never actually be taken to court - there are just too many.

            Basically, the administration is using the fact that they control every branch of government to dismantle or capture core government agencies and to provide cover for various illegal actions - forcing them through if only temporarily for various political and structural ends. A soft coup, basically. So yeah, the fact that something like this is possible is proof of the flaws inherent in this system of government.

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That’s a lot of words to say that I’m right in practice even if not in principle lmao.

              I’m a commie too, BTW. You’re way too charitable to the US institutions IMO.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Republicans hold the majority in congress, so they’re refusing to push back and are just allowing him to usurp power from them.

      • Lanske@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thnx for your reply! i understand that, but it seems nothing goes via congress?!

        • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Congress is a check and balance to executive power, just like the judicial.

          They are not checking or balancing his power. So they are in effect, impotent.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And they don’t care because the White House is occupied by someone on their team. This country fucking sickens me.