L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoA tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 yearswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1293arrow-down147file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1246arrow-down1external-linkA tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 yearswww.techradar.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
A tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 years::A glowing horizon for phones
minus-squareAganim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 months agoDepends, in my country ionization detectors have been banned over 20 years ago, you’ll mostly find optical / photoelectric detectors here.
minus-square_sideffect@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI wonder if its because of a valid reason, or just a precaution
minus-squareNoedel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoIt’s probably safe until someone decides to go look what’s inside their smoke detector
Depends, in my country ionization detectors have been banned over 20 years ago, you’ll mostly find optical / photoelectric detectors here.
I wonder if its because of a valid reason, or just a precaution
It’s probably safe until someone decides to go look what’s inside their smoke detector