marathon@thelemmy.club to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agoRussia releases archives exposing Latvian Waffen-SS atrocities in WWIIwww.rt.comexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1115arrow-down122file-text
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkRussia releases archives exposing Latvian Waffen-SS atrocities in WWIIwww.rt.commarathon@thelemmy.club to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square124fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down21·2 days agoSo Russia is going to invade Latvia next?
minus-squarebigFab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down6·2 days agoI hope this is a joke. I mean, it’s not 100% impossible, but to compare it as ‘next target after Ukraine’ is straight childish. You sure do know what would mean war with Nato 🌍🌋
minus-squareChodi_MacCunt@lemmy.laitinlok.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·1 day agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 hours ago“my first thought when hearing about Nazi atrocities is ‘Russia bad’” Average unscratched liberal
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoYou think this is the first time I’m hearing about Nazi atrocities??
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoI’m assuming you replied to the wrong comment
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoYou assume incorrectly, again
minus-squareMasterBlaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down17·2 days agoLooks that way, doesn’t it?
So Russia is going to invade Latvia next?
I hope this is a joke. I mean, it’s not 100% impossible, but to compare it as ‘next target after Ukraine’ is straight childish. You sure do know what would mean war with Nato 🌍🌋
Removed by mod
My first thought too.
“my first thought when hearing about Nazi atrocities is ‘Russia bad’”
Average unscratched liberal
You think this is the first time I’m hearing about Nazi atrocities??
I’m assuming you replied to the wrong comment
You assume incorrectly, again
Looks that way, doesn’t it?
It doesn’t