In my experience learning online is way more effective and efficient.

Why it is not the default option for universities?

  • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 minutes ago

    Because American educational institutions are not and haven’t been about academia and learning for some time. It’s a good ol’ boys club you pay with daddy’s money or massive amounts of debt to be a part of, to give you a piece of paper you can use to virtue signal to other people who wasted similar amounts of money in the same place.

    Hiring in IT has been an eye opener, I actively distrust people who present their degree as their first and foremost point of hirability; because they’re usually useless.

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Things like lectures I agree are actually better online than in person, but there’s a lot about university learning that can’t really be replicated online.

    The most obvious thing being physical demonstrations and hands on projects, which I had in several physics and engineering classes.

    Also I think in-person works better for discussion sections or office hours, where talking it out and writing it on a board is often easier to do in person than online (although there are tools for these things online).

    Another big thing you’d miss out on by studying online is the whole social aspect of living away from your parents and with other people your age and making friends and going to parties and such.

  • CrowyTech@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The MSc Sustainability from Cranfield University is all online besides a 4 day residential each year.

    Seems to work really well for them.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve got a master’s degree and I’ve also been a teaching assistant and I strongly disagree with the notion that online teaching is more effective. Putting all materials online is useful, but explaining something to someone is way more effective when you’re standing next to them.

  • derfunkatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As with remote work, it really depends on what you’re doing. Some jobs and classes are tailor made for remote, some are nearly impossible to accomplish remotely. COVID inspired some really creative uses of technology but at the end of the day, it was an augmentation not a drop-in replacement.

    I think online courses should be available as much as possible whenever practical, but what we all have to realize is that designing an effective online curriculum is expensive and difficult. We also have to realize that certain activities will never transition to online and we just need to accept that. Taking a lecture with 300 students? Put that that thing online. Learning an instrument? You need to be in-person for your lessons and ensembles.

    What needs to change is how in-person workers are compensated and how institutions support the development of online programs. It’s not either/or, it’s both/and.

  • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Some classes translate to an online format much easier than others. How do you effectively translate an upper level chemistry lab to be done online? Even if you could do it in such a way that the student gains the theoretical knowledge, it wouldn’t give them the hands on practice that they’ll need for real lab work.

  • KRAW@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What are your metrics for “effective?” As someone who is both teaching and taking classes currently, I can tell you engagement is pitifully low in online formats. Education is not just about memorizing facts and going through the motions to get a good grade. There’d have to be some amazing innovation in online education practices to convince me it will be the default anytime soon.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In practice, online education is worse. Discussion boards are a shallow replacement for real shoulder to shoulder conversations, many students speed through video lectures, and the entire experience seems flattened and gamified. It feels more “effective and efficient” but that feeling doesn’t necessarily match reality.

  • Grabthar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    According to everything I have seen and read on the matter, most kids seemed to have a shit time with online schooling during COVID. Too easy to be distracted, frequent technical problems, no hands on activities or labs, no socialisation, no arts programs, no physical education, terrible support for kids who had learning problems or who otherwise required customised education plans, and the much larger class sizes meant an overall poorer quality of education.

    For many, it was an unmitigated disaster, and most kids are much happier to be back at school in person. A handful loved it though. My daughter was one, though she also is very happy to have music classes again, so even she prefers being back in school.

    Our conservative provincial government liked the cost savings though, so they tried to introduce an online course requirement to get your high school diploma, but due to popular demand, they had to include an opt out option. Since the opt out was so popular, they are now making it harder to access by requiring that you fill out a form for it available only by contacting the school guidance office.

    Let’s face it, online education is not popular because it sucks unless your program only requires a lecture, you are very motivated to learn and study, you don’t need or want to discuss anything complicated with profs or peers, you have no learning or hearing disabilities, and you prefer to avoid people. It is great for work you already know how to do, which is the reason my daughter loved it, and why I like working from home. But default online education? Correspondence school has long been a thing, so if that’s you, fill your boots. It seems most would rather pass on it.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      no socialisation

      Between missing in-person schooling and social media, we have an entire generation that are, socially speaking, idiots. I see posts on here everyday that remind me of that.

  • The Real King Gordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think a great majority of learning in college comes from living someplace other than home. Meeting different kinds of people from different places and spending time with them. Classes are very important but so much learning happens outside of classrooms.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think this is one of the reasons conservatives hate college. Impressionable students might develop empathy, and we certainly can’t have that.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        In my experience, it doesn’t need to be on-campus. Just getting to know other students and working/studying with them is enough.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve never lived on campus and idk how it works in the US but when I’d come in for the lectures I still met plenty of people who challenged me and my ideas and helped me grow as a person. Hell even just taking the subway to campus every day got me to actually start adulting and out of the shell of school and home life.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In my experience

    That’s great, and that’s why it’s an option.

    But research consistently shows that everyone is different and has different learning needs.

    More ways to learn means more people succeed in learning.

    Now your specific question is still quite interesting, with emphasis added to default:

    Why it is not the default option for universities?

    I think online is rapidly becoming the default for anything that can be learned online, for anyone who can learn online.

    But I’m thankful that we have both community colleges and universities for things that cannot be effectively taught online and for people who needs more modes of learning.