Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it’s complicated.

    • infamousbelgian@waste-of.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, but that is not what the movie is about.

      He did say (no one knows what he believed) that just having the bomb would mean world peace…

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can’t use a weapon on a nation, you can only use a weapon on a nation’s population.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Look up most of the contemporary US pacific command saying the bombings were unnecessary. I know Asian people are just ants to people like you but Jesus, the pathetic rationalizations.

            • TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ants is a pretty apt comparison to Japanese culture at the time. All expected to become soldiers and die for the hive. Seriously, shit was crazy. They were not going to surrender otherwise.

              Firebombings were daily killing more than the bombs did as well.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ants is a pretty apt comparison to Japanese culture at the time.

                Okay, thank you for proving my point and admitting you’re a virulent racist so publicly.