A whole swath of GOP voters appears firmly committed to not voting for Trump in November.

Donald Trump has a problem no matter what happens in New Hampshire on Tuesday night: There’s a whole swath of the Republican electorate and a good chunk of independents who appear firmly committed to not voting for him in November if he becomes the nominee.

It’s an issue that became starkly apparent in polling ahead of the Iowa caucuses, when an NBC News/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll of voters in that state found that fully 43 percent of Nikki Haley supporters said they would back President Joe Biden over Trump. And it’s a dynamic that has been on vivid display as the campaign shifted this week to New Hampshire.

“I can’t vote for Trump. He’s a crook. He’s too corrupt,” said Scott Simeone, 64, an independent voter from Amherst, who backed Trump in 2016 and 2020. “I voted for him, and I didn’t realize he’s as corrupt as he is.”

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The only goal for anyone who values what little democracy we have left is that Donald Trump does not get reelected. Period.

    The only vote that helps that goal is for Biden.

    There’s nothing to debate here, unless you’re an accelerationist. And in that case I’d just like to remind folks that revolution is brutal, not fun and exciting.

    • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agreed. We can go back to a more nuanced discussion of voters choice and freedom of speech when we’re not actively barreling towards autocracy. If you don’t draw the line somewhere, you’re simply saying you don’t see a need for one.

    • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      A secondary goal is to convince people who are on the fence about voting for trump to vote for literally anyone else.

    • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to mention that the above statement is a much better argument AND is mathematically provable using the same method I used above (any vote not for candidate A becomes a -1 or a -2.)

      It’s a much better statement to use when trying to sway voter opinion.

      Also definitely the more important point I’m making above is that Biden is NOT the lesser of two evils. The moves he’s made have not been the biggest or the best but a lot of that’s in part because he needs a solid base of good Congress people working alongside him to accomplish any real progress on any of the initiatives he’s been pushing. The President does not make laws, though having the correct President in office does lower the bar at getting good laws passed. If a good law never crosses his desk because we have a bunch of regressives in office like we currently do, not a lot it’s going to happen.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden is NOT the lesser of two evils

        In the US, only one of the two major parties will get elected as president. That means that either Trump or Biden will be elected barring one of them being incapacitated in some way before the election.

        So you’re saying that between Biden and Trump, Biden is as evil, or more evil than Trump?

        • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Holy crap no. I’m saying Biden has been actively good (to my surprise, but I digress) and to not want to vote for him “being the lesser of two evils” shows a disconnect from reality on par with the current state of the Republican everything.

          A huge chunk of that ‘good’ never coming to light is a combination of media just never talking about it, and conservatives and regressives in Congress actively blocking his efforts (the most well known instance of this being the student loan debt forgiveness)

          This thread is about people who refuse to vote for biden because he is the lesser of two scrolls, my original point was that giving people retoric like “a vote not for Biden is a vote for Trump” is a bad faith argument, and using more grounded statements like “voting for Biden is the best way to ensure we don’t get another term of Trump.”

          Meanwhile it’s also with pointing out to the third party people who refuse to vote for Biden as the lesser of two evils that Biden is in fact not even an evil, and that he actively tried to do a lot of good. If we can stack congress with same congress people who have better things to given than people’s genitals age bedrooms and some decent bills make their way across his desk, he’s probably not going to veto them.

          Some of the people using this argument are probably Bernie bros who are butthurt over Bernie stepping down in 2020 and the DNCs antics back in 2016. It’s probably worth mentioning that right now Bernie can do a lot more good in the Senate than he can in the oval office, since we have a president who wouldn’t block his policies. If Trump or Haley get into office that’s not going to be the case and refusing to vote for Biden over that hurts their favorite politicians agenda a lot.