First, they restricted code search without logging in so I’m using sourcegraph But now, I cant even view discussions or wiki without logging in.

It was a nice run

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I moved all my open source projects to Gitlab the day Microsoft announced they were acquiring Github.

    (I wish in retrospect I’d taken the time to research and decide on the right host. I likely would have gone to Codeberg instead of Gitlab had I done so. But Gitlab’s still better than Github. And I don’t really know for sure that Codeberg was even around back when Microsoft acquired Github.)

    • antrosapien@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      My first impression of gitlab was offputting because I was using hardened firefox and couldnt get past through cloudflare so I ended up using github. It was also better ui wise but now its just a mess

      Edit: slowly i’m starting to move everything to codeberg

      • bizdelnick@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        1. It is FOSS while GitLab EE is not.
        2. It supports a lot of atifact repository formats while GitLab only docker registry.
        3. It is a non-commercial project.
      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Codeberg is ran by a German nonprofit. GitLab is publically-traded on NASDAQ.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m not really sure it is. I just wish I’d shopped around before jumping to Gitlab, really.

        It kindof feels like Gitlab’s aims are more commercial and Codeberg’s are more in line with the FOSS movement, but that’s just a vague sense I have based on things I’ve seen but no longer remember specifically.

        CalcProgrammer1’s response to my post seems pretty informative and apropos, though.

    • akrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The landscape is changing so fast thanks to LLMs, everything is becoming gated behind logins. Thanks ChatGPT.

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I still left my old and unmaintained projects on GitHub but I moved all my active projects to GitLab and any new projects go there too. I have them auto mirrored back to GitHub though as the more mirrors the better. I also recently set up a Codeberg mirror for some of my projects, though GitLab’s CI is what is keeping me on GitLab even though they nerfed the shit out of it and made it basically a requirement to host your own runners even for FOSS projects a year or two back. Still hate them for that and if Codeberg gets a solid CI option, leaving GitLab would make me happy. They too have seen quite a lot of enshittification in the years since Microsoft bought GitHub.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        nerfed the shit out of it and made it basically a requirement to host your own runners even for FOSS projects a year or two back.

        Did they just reduce quotas (minutes?, cache storage?) or did they remove features? I’ve always used self-hosted runner

        • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Drastically nerfed the quotas. FOSS projects with a valid license used to have GitLab Premium access to shared runners and now even FOSS projects with a valid license get a rather useless 400 minutes. They also require new accounts to add CC info just to use that paltry sum which means FOSS projects can’t rely on CI passing on forks to ensure a merge request passes the checks before merging, as even if you have project specific runners set up forks don’t use them and neither to MRs.

          I wish companies didn’t offer what they can’t support from the beginning rather than this embrace, extend, extinguish shit. I guess in GitLab’s case there was no extend, it was just embrace FOSS projects and let them set up CI pipelines and get projects depending on the shared CI runners as part of merge request workflow for a few years and then extinguish by yoinking that access away and fucking over everyone’s workflow, leaving us scrambling to set up project side runners and ruining checks on MRs.