• Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Star ratings are very broken, because everyone seems to think of the rating differently. IMO the criteria should be like this:

    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ = The best thing ever.

    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️⚫️ = Above average.

    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⚫️ ⚫️ = It’s ok. Get’s the job done. Not great, not terrible. The usual. Nothing special. Totally average.

    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⚫️ ⚫️ ⚫️ = Below average. I’m disappointed.

    ⭐️ ⚫️ ⚫️ ⚫️ ⚫️ = Worst thing ever. Crime against humanity. Ban this product and burn the remaining stock immediately.

    However, in reality people tend to use it like this.

    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ = It’s ok. I don’t have anything to complain about. Could be ok, could be great or anything in between.

    ⭐️ I’m not happy. Minor complaints, big complaints and anything in between.

    When it comes to book reviews, the five star reviews tend to be useless. Especially when it comes to self help books, it seems like those reviews were made by people who are completely incapable of noticing any flaws in the book. I’m inclined to think those people shouldn’t even review a book if they can’t think of it critically. On Amazon there are always lots and lots of fake reviews produced in a click farm, but in other places you’ll also find genuinely incompetent reviewers too.