• Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    This highlights an interesting point:

    IF a platform hosts terrorism { white-supremacism, islamist supremacism, male-supremacism with its beloved domestic-violence “enforcement”, communist-party machiavellianism, fascist machiavellianism, moneyarchist machiavellianism, etc. }…

    and is able to hide that from the “majority”

    THEN they’re doing good for the world, aren’t they?


    Hiding one’s evils isn’t what “doing good” means.

    Not enforcing evil, is what doing good means.


    Humankind’ll walk, willingly, into its own slaughterhouse, for sake of the lollipops humankind’s fed by the manipulators of the world.

    That has been going-on for centuries.

    Nothing’s magically changing, surprise, surprise.

    _ /\ _

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not sure what you’re trying to say either, but fascist speech using lies is fascist recruitment. That is why autonomous anti-fascism is right to disrupt fascist recruitment events in universities. Because the state or moderates care more about maintaining order. So you have to disrupt the recruiting by any means.

      So if your argument is that “sunlight is the best disinfectant” then no, it definitely isn’t. There is historical evidence.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not sure I understand your post fully, but yes, judgement of the majority is a bad criterion.

      Not sure BlueSky offers a better system, still optimistic for Locutus.